Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats: Caleb Williams Leads Bears to Thrilling 25-24 Win

Monday Night Football under the lights at Northwest Stadium rarely disappoints, and Week 6 was no exception. If you’re hunting for the full chicago bears vs washington commanders match player stats breakdown from this one, you’re in the right place — this game came down to the final possession, three receiving touchdowns from Jayden Daniels, and a defense-optional fourth quarter that flipped the outcome twice.

The Lead

On Monday, October 13, 2025, the Chicago Bears traveled to Landover, Maryland, and left with a 25-24 win over the Washington Commanders in front of 64,457 fans at Northwest Stadium. The nationally televised ABC broadcast delivered exactly the kind of chaos Monday Night Football is known for, with Washington twice building a lead in the second half only to watch Chicago answer with a field goal drive that stood up as the difference.

Caleb Williams didn’t put up gaudy numbers by volume, but his 252 passing yards and a touchdown were enough behind a ground game that churned out 150 rushing yards, led by D’Andre Swift’s 108 on 14 carries. Washington countered through the air, with Jayden Daniels throwing for 211 yards and three touchdowns on an efficient 19-of-26, but three lost fumbles and a red-zone field-goal miss from Matt Gay proved costly in a game decided by a single point.

Match Overview Table

Core Match Statistics Overview

Anyone digging into this bears commanders box score will notice the yardage was close, but the details in the margins told the real story.

Passing Efficiency

• Jayden Daniels was the more accurate passer by a wide margin, completing nearly three-quarters of his throws and posting a 119.2 passer rating against Chicago’s defense.
• Caleb Williams played it safer through the air — zero interceptions — but needed 29 attempts to reach 252 yards, a lower per-throw average than his counterpart.

Turnover Battle

• Washington’s three fumbles, with two lost, gave Chicago short fields and extra possessions that a one-point game simply can’t absorb.
• Chicago protected the football completely, finishing without a giveaway while forcing one Jayden Daniels interception through Jaquan Brisker.

Kicking Reliability

• Jake Moody connected on 4 of 5 field goal attempts for Chicago, including a 48-yarder, and those points ended up being the exact margin of victory.
• Matt Gay’s lone miss on a 50/50 range attempt, paired with going just 1-of-2 overall, left points on the field Washington couldn’t afford to leave behind.

Ground Game Balance

• D’Andre Swift’s 108 rushing yards on 14 carries (7.7 yards per attempt) gave Chicago a steady complement to Williams’ passing attack all night.
• Washington’s rushing attack was spread across five different ball-carriers but never found a similar explosive gear, topping out at Jacory Croskey-Merritt’s 61 yards on 17 attempts.

Period-by-Period Analysis

First Quarter

• Chicago’s opening drives leaned on Swift and short passes to set the tone, capped by an early field goal.
• Washington’s offense stayed quiet in the opening frame, unable to generate points against a Bears defense that started fast.
• The Bears controlled field position from the opening kickoff return by Devin Duvernay.

Second Quarter

• The two teams traded scores in the second quarter, with Washington finally getting on the board.
• Chicago’s touchdown drive pushed the halftime advantage back in the Bears’ favor, 13-7.
• Both offenses showed they could move the ball; the difference was Chicago converting more of its trips into touchdowns rather than settling for kicks.

Third Quarter

• Washington’s best stretch of the night came out of the locker room, outscoring Chicago 10-3 to erase the deficit and briefly take the lead.
• Jayden Daniels found his rhythm through the air in this quarter, connecting on throws that set up scoring chances.
• Chicago’s offense stalled into a single Jake Moody field goal, unable to match Washington’s third-quarter surge.

Fourth Quarter

• Chicago answered the third-quarter swing with a 9-point fourth quarter that included the go-ahead scoring and a clinching field goal.
• Washington’s final touchdown kept things within a single score, forcing Chicago’s offense to milk the clock down the stretch.
• The Bears leaned on the run late, protecting a lead built on discipline rather than explosive plays, and closed out the 25-24 win.

Chicago Bears Player Statistics

Caleb Williams (QB) — 17/29, 252 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT, 98.6 rating Williams avoided mistakes all night, and while the touchdown total was modest, his zero-turnover performance kept Chicago’s offense on schedule through four quarters.

D’Andre Swift (RB) — 14 carries, 108 rushing yards; 2 catches, 67 receiving yards, 1 TD Swift was the engine of Chicago’s offense, combining a 7.7 yards-per-carry average on the ground with a 55-yard receiving touchdown that stretched the field.

DJ Moore (WR) — 3 catches, 42 receiving yards Moore didn’t find the end zone but drew consistent targets and moved the chains on third down throughout the night.

Rome Odunze (WR) — 2 catches, 32 receiving yards Odunze added a complementary receiving presence, giving Williams a reliable second option outside the numbers.

Washington Commanders Player Statistics

Jayden Daniels (QB) — 19/26, 211 yards, 3 TD, 1 INT, 119.2 rating Daniels was the most efficient passer on the field, spreading three touchdowns across three different targets even while missing two of his top three receivers to injury.

Jacory Croskey-Merritt (RB) — 17 carries, 61 rushing yards Croskey-Merritt shouldered the early-down workload, though he couldn’t break a run longer than 11 yards against a physical Chicago front.

Zach Ertz (TE) — 6 catches, 43 receiving yards, 1 TD Ertz was Daniels’ most-targeted weapon, hauling in six catches and finding the end zone as Washington’s short-to-intermediate safety valve.

Chris Moore (WR) — 3 catches, 46 receiving yards, 1 TD Moore made the most of his opportunities in an injury-thinned receiving corps, averaging over 15 yards per catch and scoring on one of his three grabs.

Statistical Leaders Summary Table

Why the Bears Won

Turnover-Free Football

Chicago’s offense didn’t commit a single giveaway, a stark contrast to Washington’s three fumbles. In a one-point game, that discipline was the single biggest separator on the stat sheet.

Special Teams Reliability

Jake Moody’s 4-of-5 kicking night, including a 48-yard field goal, gave Chicago a scoring floor Washington couldn’t match after Matt Gay missed one of his two attempts.

Balanced Run-Pass Attack

Chicago’s 150 rushing yards paired with 252 through the air meant Washington’s defense never knew which way to lean. Swift’s role as both a runner and a 67-yard receiving option made him nearly impossible to game-plan around cleanly.

Why the Commanders Lost

Costly Fumbles in Winnable Moments

Washington’s two lost fumbles handed Chicago extra possessions and shortened fields at a time when every drive mattered. Those unforced errors offset an otherwise sharp passing performance from Daniels.

Missed Points on Special Teams

Matt Gay’s 1-of-2 showing on field goals meant Washington left points on the board in a game ultimately decided by a single point — the kind of margin where every kick matters.

Historical Context & Advanced Insights

Season Series and Rivalry Context

This was the fourth straight season the two clubs have met, and the second time they’ve squared off specifically on Monday Night Football. Washington entered the night having won the previous meeting in Week 8 of the 2024 season on a 52-yard Hail Mary from Daniels, making this result a measure of revenge for Chicago. All-time, Washington still leads the series.

Advanced Statistical Insights

Daniels’ passer rating advantage (119.2 to 98.6) reflected his sharper accuracy, but efficiency numbers only tell part of the story when turnovers are added to the equation. Washington actually out-gained Chicago in expected passing value on a per-attempt basis, yet the two lost fumbles converted that statistical edge into a net negative in real point swings. Chicago’s approach — spreading production across Swift as both rusher and receiver rather than relying on one dominant playmaker — also reduced its exposure to any single matchup Washington’s defense could take away.

Game Implications & Key Lessons

What This Means for the Bears

• A 3-2 record with a road win over a divisional-caliber opponent builds early-season confidence under new head coach Ben Johnson.
• Zero turnovers in a tight primetime environment is a repeatable formula Chicago will want to lean on going forward.
• Swift’s dual-threat role gives the offense a blueprint for exploiting mismatches against tougher fronts later in the year.

What This Means for the Commanders

• The fumble issues need to be cleaned up immediately, especially with the offense already missing key receiving weapons to injury.
• Washington’s red-zone execution, both through the missed field goal and stalled possessions, is an area that needs sharpening before the schedule gets tougher.
• Even with Daniels playing efficiently, one-score losses like this one add up if the turnover margin doesn’t improve.

Key Lessons

• Turnover margin remains the single most predictive stat in close NFL games.
• A dual-threat back who can both run and catch adds an extra layer of offensive unpredictability.
• Missed field goals in the 45-55 yard range can swing a one-possession game entirely.
• Spreading touchdown production across multiple targets, as Daniels did, still isn’t enough without ball security.
• Divisional and rivalry familiarity often produces tighter scores regardless of the records on paper.
• Special teams reliability — kicking especially — deserves as much attention as marquee offensive numbers.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Bears vs Commanders game?

The Chicago Bears won 25-24 over the Washington Commanders on Monday, October 13, 2025, at Northwest Stadium.

Who had the best stats in the Bears-Commanders game?

Jayden Daniels led all passers with 211 yards and 3 touchdowns, while Caleb Williams threw for 252 yards for Chicago. D’Andre Swift was the game’s most versatile player, combining 108 rushing yards with a 67-yard receiving touchdown.

What were the game’s stats for Caleb Williams?

Williams finished 17-of-29 for 252 yards, 1 touchdown, 0 interceptions, and a 98.6 passer rating.

In this game, what were Jayden Daniels’ stats?

Daniels went 19-of-26 for 211 yards, 3 touchdowns, and 1 interception, finishing with a 119.2 passer rating.

How many points did D’Andre Swift score for the Bears?

Swift scored one touchdown, a 55-yard receiving score, and also led all rushers in the game with 108 yards on 14 carries.

Where was the Bears vs Commanders game played?

In front of 64,457 spectators, the game took place at Northwest Stadium in Landover, Maryland.

Conclusion

This Bears-Commanders matchup came down to fundamentals rather than fireworks. Washington’s Jayden Daniels was, by the raw numbers, the more efficient quarterback on the field, but turnovers and a missed field goal handed Chicago just enough margin to escape Landover with a win. 

Caleb Williams and D’Andre Swift’s clean, balanced approach outlasted Washington’s flashier passing stat line — proof that in a one-point game, avoiding mistakes matters just as much as making plays.